Wikipedia |
Agrowing
sense of alarm over the rising incidents of mid-air collisions and near misses,
brought about the introduction of TCAS and today the sky is far safer to fly in. However, this also brought about an unwelcome and
recurrent side effect that of nuisance or operationally undesired RA commands.
An
operationally undesired RA is one that is triggered during 1000 ft level off manoeuvres,
while the crew is operating within clearances granted. This normally occurs
when the vertical closure rates are high. This accounts for almost 50 % of RAs encountered
in today’s environment.
Several
recommendations have been made to address this issue. PANS- OPS Doc 8168, ICAO recommends adopting rate
less than 1500 fpm throughout the last 1000 ft of climb/ descent to the
assigned altitude, when aware of traffic nearby. The Airbus FCOM recommends
that the Vertical Speed be reduced to 1500 ft during the last 2000 ft to level
off when known traffic is present in the area. While different regulatory
bodies evolved similar solutions, the core aim was a need to alter the altitude
capture laws without compromising the climb performance capability.
In
response to the above requirements, Airbus has developed a new system called
the TCAS Alert Prevention or TCAP. The principle was to introduce a new
altitude capture law that will soften the capture in the presence of other
aircraft. Its activation logic is based on the traffic Advisory (TA), triggered
by TCAS system, which clearly confirms the presence of other aircraft in the
vicinity. A concept of TCAS availability
threshold DZ avail was introduced to define the upper distance from the
selected altitude where a TA can occur with an intruder capturing the same
altitude in the opposite sense. The DZ avail value hence depends on both
the vertical speed at the time of TA and its altitude. The triggering conditions
require that
- AP,FD must remain engaged
- Aircraft is converging towards its selected altitude
- The distance to the selected altitude at the time of the TA is lower than DZavail.
No comments:
Post a Comment